Sunday, May 1, 2011

More ESP

In the past 36 hours, I have had the distinct feeling that some head of state would be assassinated by a bullet directly into his forehead. I have had a massive headache since yesterday, which does not relent, not from morphine, not from anti-inflammatories, not from Benadryl.

Perhaps it was Osama Bin Laden. Perhaps not. Only certain the slain would not be female.

Aside from the proclamations of Al-Quaeda being "terrorists", we know litlle about them, or the structure of their organization. i feel it is based on the hydra, and cutting off it's primary head will only unleash the other to do as they will. While someone guided them, he no doubt vetoed some actions. Those actions may be carried out without strategy, with no thought to consequence. They will go to the death.

I had two strange visions also. Onw was a bird made of fire swooping down, the rider a man with a black hat. It was about to attack some prey below.

The second visison were two dragons of fire as pillars on either side of the "frame" of the dream.

Both artistically beautiful, I'd love to recreate them in my painting, but not knowing the origin or target of the bird of fire nor anything appearing with the two dragons, who were there as a warnign but not menacing anything, I have nothing to which to relate the two things.

On the day of the beatification of Pope John Paul, which should have been a day of peace, it is clear that some will never lay their weapons down until they pass from this Earth, or until this Earth  passes away from them.

In reality, Osama Bin Laden was a major source of intelligence or the USA because he had a habit of announcing his plans and principles. Which did give warning. More than can be said for the stray NATO planes no doubt commanded by USA and not the countries wherein they were stationed. I consider those tobe acts of terrorism by the USA using duck-blind puppets claiming the right under NATo alliance. Just one problem: NaATO was formed for the common defence of the North Atlantic Countries, none of whom were under attack by Lybia unless they invaded Lybian air space. In which case, Lybia had every right to shoot them down.

Why is the USA the only country in the world who hs a right to do these things, and demand other countries remain their puppets even when they have not been attacked?

It is very clear that Lybia is the only Eastern Africa nation who had the military power to defend the smaller countries down below from further plunder they have already suffered at the hands of US oil companies and the carpet baggers who come along with them.

And if you don't see it, it is time to look at it as it really is. Europe had no beef with Lybia. Europe was denounced by the USA for trading with Lybia, for oil ecspecially. Those same countries now have been manipulated into being a part of this war puppet regime which is far more clear now than under any other President. They had other smoke screens. Any part of the world where they were involved which came under scrutiny would simply result in a fire storm in another part of the world, withdrawing attention from the "objective".

How many people have these things killed since 2001? And how many more?

It was said, In fighting those that are evil, care must be taken not to become them. The USA has become them.

Regine Pegi